Rick Tocchet played for six teams in his 18-year N.H.L. career. A four time All-Star, Tocchet is now an assistant coach under the legendary Wayne Gretzky. Or should I say was. Suspended by the league indefinitely, Tocchet surrendered to authorities investigating a multi-million dollar gambling ring. New Jersey State Trooper James Harney was also taken into custody after officers searched his home and found bundles of cash, Roles watches and nine plasma televisions. Harney was charged with racketeering, money laundering and official misconduct. Meanwhile, the fate of Gretzky’s wife, Janet Jones, remains murky after revelations that she wagered (quite successfully) on Super Bowl XL. Mr. Gretzky had this to say after Mrs. G collected her six-figure payout: “My wife is my best friend, so my love for her is deeper than anything.” The Great One then went on to refute his own culpability: “The reality is, I’m not involved. I wasn’t involved.” Not so for “professional athletes in the National Hockey League and other bettors,” says Police Superintendent Joseph Fuentes. Noting the syndicate took in nearly $2 million over a 40-day span, Fuentes expounded: “We can simply connect them from the Philly mob to this book-making enterprise.”
Fortunately for Gretzky, a wiretapped conversation with Tocchet supports his claim of innocence. So there’s at least one fan of our neo-Orwellian zeitgeist. Nonetheless, odds are Wayne won’t find much rapport amongst rank and file members of the NYPD. During a 2004 collective bargaining dispute with the city, off-duty members of the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association (read: labor union) were videotaped by Internal Affairs officers as they demonstrated. Each protester was zoomed in on and photographed. As a result, the PBA is suing the city, claiming, among other things, an infringement of free speech. The association’s litigator argued, “There was no basis whatsoever for employing the Internal Affairs Division… except as a means of political harassment. There wasn’t suspicion of criminal activity.” So there it is. Not even miles from ground zero, the very people armed with expanded antiterrorism capabilities (and responsibilities) have seen those capabilities sharply turned against them. One can only imagine, then, the violations suffered by average citizens.
Heather Wilson, for one, looks like any other soccer mom driving around Albuquerque, New Mexico. And like a lot of Americans, she has “serious concerns” over the President’s domestic spying program. What distinguishes Wilson is not the fact that she’s a Republican but that she’s a Republican Member of Congress. Try as it might, the White House is having a tough time dismissing her as ignorant or soft on terrorism given her Rhodes scholarship and 11 years in the Air Force. Not to mention her chairmanship of the House Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence. Although the FBI has characterized this controversial NSA surveillance as “unproductive” and “pointless intrusions on Americans’ privacy,” Dick Cheney continues to grumble that ANY scrutiny of the wiretapping program (including, presumably, the upcoming secret — and limited — Congressional briefings) will be of strategic assistance to the enemy. Shrugging off Yemen’s apparent complicity in the escape of 23 Al Qaeda prisoners, the Vice President eschewed divulging any terrorist threat linked to the CIA’s warrantless seizure of thousands of women’s panties.
The clandestine break-and-enter operation was blown open when Scooter Libby leaked the name of “mid-level” agency operative George C. Dalmas III, who for months unobtrusively plied the leafy suburban streets surrounding our nation’s capital. What does remain a mystery is why Cheney is keeping mum given the President’s recent bout of pedantry. In an attempt to justify the NSA’s Watergate-like activities, the President gave a detailed speech implying that the highly specific and precise information culled by counterintelligence specialists was requisite in foiling a nefarious 2002 plot. Reading from a prepared text, Mr. Bush laboriously recounted Khalid Sheik Mohammad’s diabolical plans: “Rather than use Arab[s]… Mohammad sought out young men from Southeast Asia [to] hijack an airplane using shoe bombs to breach the cockpit door, and fly the plane into the tallest building on the West Coast… the Liberty Tower in Los Angeles.” The fly in the NSA ointment, of course, is that there is no Liberty Tower in L.A., though you can certainly find one in New York, Tokyo, Las Vegas or half a dozen other major cities. What is less certain is whether this narrowly averted disaster was at one time imminent or merely conjured up for dramatic effect.
In his own cinematic turn, 18-year-old Jacob Robida performed an interpretive rendition of “Brokeback Mountain” by attacking three patrons of Puzzles Bar (gay milieu) with a hatchet and pistol (Cowboys and Indians) before his conflicted, on-again-off-again relationship with girlfriend Jennifer Bailey (labile sexual orientation) ended in a deadly gun battle with police. Rather than focus on the artistic merits of Robida’s odyssey, I wish to applaud Justice for being swift and severe. Unlike in the Enron case, where five years after the malfeasance came to light, we have barely slogged through jury selection. You may recall that Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling manipulated futures contracts while perpetrating fraud, theft and other crimes against (essentially captive) energy consumers. It is with great irony that Dublin’s Intrade established a futures market to trade the number of convictions prosecutors can secure. Skilling’s lawyer reacted sharply: “I think it’s abhorrent, betting on people’s lives,” while Lay’s added, “It should probably be illegal.” It’s unclear if the $500-an-hour attorneys were referring to the unseemly courtside speculation or to their clients’ now-defunct business practices.