I had intended a retrospective on 2010 – Chilean miners, Russian spies, Oil spills – but ruminating on the Flash Crash or the Ground Zero Mosque at this point, considering the gravity of the shootings in Tucson and the paradigm shattering events in the mid-East would only serve to evoke some desperate and creepy nostalgia like getting caught jerking off to faded images of Janice Kapinski in my high school yearbook. Nonetheless, there are some timeless themes that derive from events of the past year.
1) Let the marital dissolutions visited upon Sandra Bullock, Eva Longoria and Tipper Gore serve to remind that no manner of public adoration, professional achievement or financial stature can overcome the curse of small tits when it comes to keeping your man.
2) If this ataxic economy has spawned idealized images of robbing your neighborhood 7-11, know this: while the criminal justice system occasionally fails – sometimes glaringly so – often enough the scales are eventually righted. In some instances the guilt-plagued perpetrators themselves are driven to append (O.J. Simpson) or reproduce (Joran Van der Sloot) their unpunished crimes. For others (Tom DeLay), the courts eventually wend their way to an apt, if torturously protracted, verdict. In the absence of either (Sen. Ted Stevens), there remains an off chance that the hand of God will flick you off this mortal coil by means of a sudden and horrible death. And keep in mind, as you mull your next feasible delictum, there’s no appellate process with option three.
It would be my custom, at this juncture, to castigate those who lay blame for the Arizona killings at the foot of the mental health system. Admittedly, warning signs were in no short supply in the troubled life of Jared Lee Loughner, but the fact remains that it was a loaded gun that afforded Mr. Loughner the ability to wreak so much damage. I would venture that had he attempted to assassinate Congresswoman Giffords with a candlestick or piece or rope, he would have been stomped to death long before inflicting the level of damage that was so sadly achieved on January 8th. I would have said as much, mind you, save for the fact that, only weeks later, 23-year-old Maskim Gelman proved, in the span of one day’s time, the possibility of killing four New Yorkers and hospitalizing several others wielding nothing but a knife and a 1995 Pontiac Bonneville.
With Eminem pimping for Chrysler, the UAW handing out $4,000 bonus checks and GM issuing a record setting IPO, one could argue that the auto industry bailout was a reasonable decision in the midst of a massive economic meltdown. Though far from thriving, Detroit is showing a pulse – sales figures and accolades paint the Chevy Volt as the greatest thing since electricity – unlike the Democrats who remain feckless and jelly-spined in the face of another (see: 1994) Republican takeover.
It has been widely known for years that House Speaker John Boehner (R–OH) is a habitual inebriate. Yet only now do we discover, via The National Enquirer, that Mr. Boner also has a thirst for the ladies, with at least two women (Is this what Sarah Palin meant by “Drill, baby, drill”?) identified as paramours. And if you find yourself doubting the veracity of a publication that claims Elvis is helming a fleet of UFOs set to conquer Earth, it might help to know The New York Times was on the verge of printing a similar article on the eve of the November elections before chickening out. But that’s what liberals do; they pussy out. Even after 60 Minutes broadcast the Speaker whimpering incomprehensively like a febrile infant, there was nary a whisper from the left questioning his mental status if not his fitness to serve as the nation’s third highest ranking elected official. Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, had no qualms investigating President Clinton’s dalliances while in the midst of his own extra-marital affair. The former Speaker, you may recall, was playing the family values card while serving divorce papers to his cancer stricken wife. Now that’s ballsy.
If the shoe were on the other foot, you could bet your bottom dollar that impeachment hearings would be well under way: two arch-conservative Supreme Court Justices, Scalia and Thomas, failed to recuse themselves from a campaign finance case (Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission) after attending a fundraiser sponsored by an affiliate of the plaintiff. Though a court spokesperson claimed that Scalia did not attend and Thomas merely dropped by, Thomas’ own financial disclosure report noted reimbursements for four days of “transportation, meals and accommodations.” What these documents did omit, however, was the $686,589 paid over five years by the Heritage Foundation to Thomas’ wife, Virginia.
The bottom line is that Justices are subject to the conflict rules contained in 28 U.S.C. §455(a), which requires a judge or justice to “disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Moreover, the Judicial Code of Conduct states that, “a judge should not personally participate in fund-raising activities, [or] make speeches for a political organization . . . or attend [an] event sponsored by a political organization or candidate.” While the pall of Bush vs. Gore established a blatant disregard for these rules, the Citizens United case might have a residual impact: because the Court ruled that corporate (read:Koch brothers) funds could be directly spent on election advertising, Obama’s days may well be numbered. In which case, we can look forward to another president with half the brain function of Gabrielle Giffords.