The 17th century proverb construing one man’s meat as another’s poison staunchly applies to modern life well beyond the obvious case of dumpster lasagna. Take for example the €3B of 5-year 4.95% Greek bonds issued a year and a half ago. Though the offering was eight times oversubscribed, Athens’ ensuing, and abundantly predictable, fiscal and political befoulment has made investors poorer by half. Depending on whom you listen to, ObamaCare and the Iranian nuclear accord will either lead to our salvation or cement our collective demise. And what about women as leaders of contemporary society: blessing or sin?
In other words, could Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir rise to power today? Not if left to some of the most powerful men on the planet. To wit: When asked if the next (15th) incarnation could be a woman, the Dalai Lama observed, “If female Dalai Lama come, then that female must be very attractive, otherwise not much use.” Donald Trump’s assessment of rival Republican presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina was harsher still: “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?”
And yet Hillary Clinton, marshmallow countenance, cankles and all, still garners tremendous support across the land and likewise remains the greatest nightmare of the GOP. After Benghazi sputtered as a political torpedo, Republicans refashioned the inquiry into the crimination of Mrs. Clinton’s email protocol. (In fact, a year after Hillary stepped down as Secretary of State, they pushed through a law requiring the transfer of personal emails to government servers.) Repurposing a Congressional investigation is nothing new (recall the torturous arc from Whitewater to Monica Lewinsky’s cum-stained dress) and neither is the intent. As House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy boasted, “We put together a… special committee. [Hillary’s] numbers are dropping. We fought and made that happen.”
Corroboration comes in the form of Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve who is suing the committee over his termination as an investigator after he opposed the singular focus on Clinton and her emails. Lest you question Podliska’s motives, he has unequivocally declared, “I do not support Hillary Clinton for president. I am going to vote for the Republican nominee in 2016.” He went on to say, “I’m scared. I’m going up against powerful people in Washington. [In the end] the victims’ families are not going to get the truth and that’s the most unfortunate thing about this.”
A Salem witch-hunt indeed, but were her transgressions truly wicked? Remember, the Right is claiming Clinton’s laxity endangered our security even though the State Department email server they insist she should have used was hacked by the Russians. As were the systems at the White House and the Pentagon. At the same time, the Chinese infiltrated several other government computer networks thereby compiling detailed dossiers on over four million federal employees. Even the personal emails of the CIA Director and Homeland Security Secretary have been compromised. It is not conceivable, then, that the private server in the basement of her Chappaqua, N.Y. house was the least vulnerable option of all?
As for her accusers, their digital safekeeping was hardly beyond reproach. Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush harbored secret emails for seven years despite the requirement he relinquish all electronic correspondence immediately upon leaving office. To his credit, he did make public hundreds of thousands of emails on time. Unfortunately, many of those contained confidential (Social Security numbers, medical records, employee performance reports) or classified (Mid-East troop deployments, nuclear reactor security provisions) information. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, then a Milwaukee County executive up for re-election, directed public employees to illegally conduct campaign business via a secret email system. His chief-of-staff plead guilty to federal charges while another staffer was convicted of using the system to entice minors into sexual acts. But President George W. Bush may have been the greatest transgressor. A Congressional investigation into W’s 2007 wholesale removal of federal prosecutors was stymied because the administration destroyed 22 million emails that had been illegally routed through computers at Republican National Committee headquarters.
Never mind the evidence, the Republicans will bristle. What she did was far more egregious… and patently unlawful. Yet precedent says otherwise. The Department of Justice has ruled that the Freedom of Information Act “creates no obligation for an agency to search for and produce records that it does not possess and control.” When former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger sought to restrict public access to his notes and tapes by ditching them at the Library of Congress as opposed archiving them with the State Department, the seminal FOIA case rose to the Supreme Court. In the majority opinion, conservative Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote, “We hold today that, even if a document requested under the FOIA is wrongfully in the possession of a party not an ‘agency’… the federal courts have no authority to order the production of such records.”
Perhaps, as Bernie Sanders lamented, we’ve spent too much time on this arcane subject. I would hazard it matters precious little to those college students who will face a lifetime of debt – assuming, of course, they survive the mass shooting in the quad. Or to the thousands of employees shit-canned at Hewlett Packard and Morgan Stanley. The bottom line is this: in politics, nothing worthwhile comes without a pricetag. If you need to swallow something truly rancid to get to the plum pudding, so be it. Just make sure to cinch up your adult diaper real tight.