The Supreme Court has agreed to take on the nation’s only assisted suicide law and not a moment too soon for thirty-seven-year-old Stephen Dale Barbee. Barbee’s pregnant girlfriend was critically despondent and ready to give up on life after a career wasted in a Fort Worth bagel shop. So he consented to hold a pillow over her face. Legally speaking, there’s no doubt that trying to scratch out a living in a Texas deli qualifies as a terminal illness. Moreover, the notion that Lisa Underwood might have had better luck selling horse trailers in Manhattan, or dating Robert Blake, is moot now that she has beaten Terry Schiavo to the other side.
As for Barbee, he can only sit by until the high court decides whether former Attorney General John Ashcroft’s plan to prosecute doctors who prescribe lethal medications is supported by federal drug-control laws. If the Justices concur with the 9th Circuit that “the attorney general’s unilateral attempt to regulate general medical practices historically entrusted to state lawmakers interferes with the democratic debate about physician-assisted suicide and far exceeds the scope of his authority,” then Barbee’s actions will be construed to be less pernicious than palliative.
Hunter S. Thompson’s last undertaking, on the other hand, is much less susceptible to the whims of interpretation. No doubt his death came not on “little cat feet” but rather on bolts of hot steel screaming through the wind. Splattering his great Gonzo mind across the planks of his Woody Creek cabin, Thompson selfishly foreclosed on my ability to joyride in his drug-fueled jalopy. And because reminiscence is merely the weak cousin of experience, I guess I’ll be forced to start with the narcotics myself. Forget that tired business with the black ribbon; there’s nothing left but to dye my arm blue like Ackerman in a futile attempt to retrieve the invaluable as it unfailingly slithers down the drain.
Despite the right wing media’s high-profile pillory of Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby (if I spoiled the ending, too bad; Fred MacMurray dies in the hallway) the Shiavo case stubbornly remains the central lightning rod in the right-to-die debate. While command of the limited ability to drool and crap in your pants may qualify you to serve as President of the United States, questions about a meaningful existence will no doubt linger on. My friend Guttman frames the discussion philosophically: “Death is not really a promotion; it’s more of a lateral move.” Shiavo is scheduled to begin that sideways journey at 1p.m. on March 18, when her husband will FINALLY be allowed to remove her artificial feeding tube. Seven years in, Florida Judge George Greer simply grew tired of dicking around and granted Michael Schiavo the right to pull the plug. Because “there will always be ‘new’ issues,” wrote Greer, “the court is no longer comfortable granting stays simply upon the filings of new motions.” In reaction to the court order, Cardinal Renato Martino told Vatican Radio, “If Mr. Schiavo legally succeeded in provoking the death of his wife, this would not only be tragic in itself, but it would be a serious step toward legally approving euthanasia in the United States.”
It seems that Martino should be occupied with other matters at the moment, like the Pope’s rapidly declining capacity to lead the Church. Back in hospital, the Pontiff underwent a tracheotomy and was advised by doctors not to speak. Martino sheepishly conceded, “This is a big problem.” Rev. Thomas Reese observes: “Modern medicine can keep someone alive long after they can really function in this world. At the same time, the papacy has grown in importance.” Imagine Jesus, for example, nailed up on that cross with an I.V. in his arm and cans of Ensure snaking through his nose towards his stomach. Add medical life support techniques to those spectral powers and Christ might still be up there, preaching to his followers.
All this talk of death is downright depressing, and what better way to lighten the mood than to focus on the giving of newborn life. Which brings us to the subject of breast milk. For those who can’t or choose not to nurse, manufactured formula is available. Recently, producers have tossed fatty acids DHA and ARA into the mix in an attempt to more closely mimic nature’s own. But now the guys in the lab coats at Mead Johnson, Ross and Nestlé are behind the eight ball once again. A recent Texas Tech study found that levels of a toxic rocket fuel were five times higher in mothers’ milk than in store bought dairy products. Former EPA scientist Ed Urbansky remains nonplussed: “We shouldn’t be running through the streets screaming and not drinking milk because of this.” While it’s true that Percholate has contaminated much of the nation’s water supply and can even be detected in vegetables, the baby food and pharmaceutical companies are in a mad dash to add the chemical to their latest formulations. As Senator Dianne Feinstein warned, “We’ve got to come to grips with the Percholate situation quickly.”